<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Triangle of Velocities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevenhale.co.uk/main/rotorcraft/triangleofvelocities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevenhale.co.uk/main</link>
	<description>and Rotorcraft</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:15:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flight Planning &#171; Programming Praxis</title>
		<link>http://www.stevenhale.co.uk/main/rotorcraft/triangleofvelocities/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Flight Planning &#171; Programming Praxis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevenhale.co.uk/main/?page_id=177#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] solution uses the law of sines, which states that the ratio of the length of a side to the sine of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] solution uses the law of sines, which states that the ratio of the length of a side to the sine of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.stevenhale.co.uk/main/rotorcraft/triangleofvelocities/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevenhale.co.uk/main/?page_id=177#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments John.  Good to know it helped someone! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments John.  Good to know it helped someone! <img src='http://www.stevenhale.co.uk/main/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr John Medhurst</title>
		<link>http://www.stevenhale.co.uk/main/rotorcraft/triangleofvelocities/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr John Medhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevenhale.co.uk/main/?page_id=177#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this. I tried to work it out from first principles and being an engineer, started with cartesian co-ordinate geometry which leads to some tricky simultaneous equations. Then I realised that Euclidean geometry was the answer but got in a muddle again by trying to use the cosine formula. I hadn&#039;t used the sine formula since school (&gt; 40 years) and had forgotten it ! A happy rediscovery.

One thing I would add to your excellent monograph and that is to remind your readers that they must convert wind angles from &quot;from&quot; to &quot;to&quot; for consistency with the Heading and Track vectors - then everything falls into place. Since you mention spreadhseets, it might also be worth warning that they work in radians (or at least the ubiquitous Excel does). A further picky point, you don&#039;t define Wd and Ws although it&#039;s pretty obvious to anyone who has thought about the problem.

Best wishes,

John Medhurst</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this. I tried to work it out from first principles and being an engineer, started with cartesian co-ordinate geometry which leads to some tricky simultaneous equations. Then I realised that Euclidean geometry was the answer but got in a muddle again by trying to use the cosine formula. I hadn&#8217;t used the sine formula since school (&gt; 40 years) and had forgotten it ! A happy rediscovery.</p>
<p>One thing I would add to your excellent monograph and that is to remind your readers that they must convert wind angles from &#8220;from&#8221; to &#8220;to&#8221; for consistency with the Heading and Track vectors &#8211; then everything falls into place. Since you mention spreadhseets, it might also be worth warning that they work in radians (or at least the ubiquitous Excel does). A further picky point, you don&#8217;t define Wd and Ws although it&#8217;s pretty obvious to anyone who has thought about the problem.</p>
<p>Best wishes,</p>
<p>John Medhurst</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Windy Problem &#8211; Steven Hale Photography</title>
		<link>http://www.stevenhale.co.uk/main/rotorcraft/triangleofvelocities/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>A Windy Problem &#8211; Steven Hale Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevenhale.co.uk/main/?page_id=177#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] and subsequent ground speed to my spreadsheet I first had to derive the solution to the Triangle of Velocities. I thought a page showing the solution here might be useful to the next person trying to solve the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and subsequent ground speed to my spreadsheet I first had to derive the solution to the Triangle of Velocities. I thought a page showing the solution here might be useful to the next person trying to solve the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

